Forgiveness


Both researchers and the general public typically understand forgiveness as a sacrificing of justice, a "loosening of justice standards in order to permit mercy" (Exline & Baumeister, 2000, p. 147). In other words, people forsake justice concerns when they forgive others. My research in this domain argues against the assumed mutual exclusivity between justice and forgiveness. We argue that, instead of sacrificing justice, the act of forgiveness may itself be a way help repair a victim’s sense of justice, leading the victim to be less punitive, less avoidant, and more conciliatory to the offender. From this perspective, forgiveness is far from incompatible with justice; rather, forgiveness is an integral part of the justice-restoration process that can actually promote justice and reconciliation.

Shame on Beckham
 

Publications


Wenzel, M. & Okimoto, T. G. (2010). How acts of forgiveness restore a sense of justice: Addressing status/power and value concerns raised by transgressions. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40(3), 401-417. [LINK] [ABSTRACT]

Wenzel, M., Turner, J. K. & Okimoto, T. G. (2010). Is forgiveness an outcome or initiator of sociocognitive processes? Rumination, empathy, and cognitive appraisals following a transgression. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 1(4), 369-377. [LINK] [ABSTRACT]

Wenzel, M. & Okimoto, T. G. (under review). The varying meaning of forgiveness: Relationship closeness as a moderator of forgiveness effects on feelings of justice. [ABSTRACT]

 

Recent News


Research Overview

Justice restoration / Conflict management:
         > Retributive justice
         > Restorative justice
         > Compensatory justice
         > Forgiveness and justice
         > The victim's experience of injustice

Biased and unethical decision-making:
         > Gender bias in organizations